The Old Community

The Old Community

Mathon's Names

Matma 1086 Domesday Book
Mathine 1251 Calendar of Charter Rolls
Madine 1275 Hereford Episcopal Register
Matheme 13c. Lay Subsidy Rolls
Maham 1315 Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem
Mathon 1332 Lay Subsidy Rolls 1484
Matham 1467 Calendar of Patent Rolls
Mathern 1577 Saxton

“The study of rural settlement history shows that villages only appear, and are only sustained by special favourable circumstances. Rather than being permanent and inevitable, they are both vital and vulnerable.”

Visions of the Past Christopher Taylor & Richard Muir 1983

I wish to thank the people of Mathon who have given me information and encouragement, and the staff of Worcester and Hereford Libraries and Record Offices for their patient help and guidance.

Mathon 1991

Looking westward from Worcester Beacon, the highest point of the Malvern Hills, the parish of Mathon is spread below. The two tree-crowned hills, Rowburrow and Bagburrow overlook a land of quiet fields and deep narrow twisting lanes between ancient hedges, well-wooded country where sheep graze the steep hillside fields. From early times Mathon was the only Worcestershire parish west of the hills, until in 1897 the old parish was divided, part of it becoming West Malvern, and the larger portion now known as Mathon Rural, becoming part of the County of Herefordshire.

Mathon is not one compact village, but rather a collection of dispersed hamlets, which grew up round the important farms, in what were clearings in the dense woodland. Settlers felled trees, burnt undergrowth, and broke the soil to increase the area available for crops, and all this was done unaided by any kind of mechanical power. Groups of dwellings grew up at Moorend Cross where the cultivated land ended and the moor began, at Southend, South Hide, Lane End and Ham Green. In all they contain as many houses as the village itself, and there may have been a tendency at times to regard themselves as a separate community.

The oldest building is the parish church, originally dedicated to St. Margaret and dating from the 11th Century. In this building the people of Mathon have celebrated the Christian festivals for nearly a thousand years, and it still plays an active part in village life. Opposite, to the south, is Church Farm, which was a demesne farm, an ancient site which may be older than the church, in the past having a moat, which as well as having some defensive value against thieves and vagrants, also served as a fish pond to supplement the monotonous winter diet of medieval times. Church Farm is referred to in old documents as Parsonage Farm, and was one of the houses used by Vicars of Mathon.

A few yards north-west of the church is the fish pond which belonged to the Lord of the Manor. It is now much over-grown, but in the past, when kept clean and well-stocked, must have provided a useful adjunct to the moat. Adjacent to the church is the school, now used as a private dwelling. It opened in 1861, and closed in 1948 when the child population fell.

Behind the school lies Pigeon House Meadow, in which at one time must have stood the building which housed the lord’s flock of pigeons which provided a supply of eggs and fresh meat in winter, when there were few alternatives to salted meat. Since these flocks could number hundreds of birds, they were unpopular with the villagers, as they devastated their crops. It is likely that a favourite illicit meal was one of these birds.

Opposite the school leading from the church car park, is the hollow way or green lane known in the village as the “Roman Road”. A few yards on the right up this track, the map shows where a saw pit was located, and where the top sawyer and his mate in the pit below laboriously cut the hard home-grown tree trunks into boards by hand.

In the village street are the timber-framed houses, mostly built in the 17th Century in that prosperous period between 1570 and 1640. Many of these houses, which were originally thatched, have been extended and improved, and sometimes two or three dwellings made into one. Only about half the village houses have been built in the last two hundred years for the population has grown slowly except for a period in the 19th Century when improvement in medical practice ensured the survival of more children.

On the right is the Old Vicarage, built in the time of Canon Douglas. The 1861 Census shows that he was living here with his wife Octavia, their four children aged 3 to 6, Isabella Douglas, a visitor, Hannah Daniel, a cook, Martha Walker, a nurse, Amelia Webb, a housemaid, Harriet Archer, a servant, and a 14 year old groom named Eli J. Butler. The Old Vicarage, now Mathon House, is privately owned, and the Vicar lives in a new house in Cradley, having responsibility of both parishes, and Storridge.

Nearby stands the “Cliffe Arms”, named after the family which flourished in Mathon between the end of the 17th and middle of the 19th Centuries. For many years the inn must have been a convivial meeting place for the Mathon people. It was here in 1826, at the end of their year of office, that the twelve paymasters1 of the village recorded their luncheon on Easter Monday, “the expenses not to exceed £3”. It was here that the bell ringers came on the 5th of November each year, after ringing a special peal, for their ale, provided by the parish, costing 6 shillings. Perhaps we should hope that it was not this inn that Luke Staunton kept, when he appeared at Worcester Quarter Sessions in 1634, for “suffering the parishioners of Mathon to be continually drinking at all seasons, whole nights and days together”.

Though much remains from the past, change has inevitably taken place in Mathon. Two inns and two shops have closed, and there are few successors to the many tradesmen who worked here in the 19th Century. At that time, there were in the village, blacksmiths, bakers, shoemakers, glovers, joiners, tailors, wheelwrights, as well as grooms , ploughmen, and general agricultural workers - an almost completely self-supporting community. Now, most of the skilled men have to go outside the village to work, and there is no shop of any kind in the parish.

Most of the Mathon farms practise mixed farming. The “Mathon White”, the hop named after the parish is no longer grown here. Similarly the acres of fruit trees, producing the gallons of cider and perry, which the County historian, Nash2, describes, have been uprooted. Within living memory, and confirmed by large scale Ordnance Survey maps of the time, orchards stretched from the church to Lane End, a magnificent sight in Spring. What is the reason for their disappearance - a change of climate, the vagaries of international trade, or a change in customers’ tastes? The cider stones which ground hundreds of tons of apples serve as seats or as homes for Alpine plants in Mathon gardens, and the hop kilns remain decorative, but idle, awaiting conversion to country homes.

The name Mathon is believed by Professor Ekwall3 to be derived from the Old English word meaning “treasure, or gift”. Laird4 says “it has long been a superstitious opinion with the people of the neighbourhood that great quantities of treasure have been deposited in times past in this range of hills”. He goes on to say that a quantity of silver coins had been found in Mathon, but that the location and quantity had been concealed for fear of losing them. However, perhaps it is more likely that the name may derive from a gift of land in such a fertile district.

Whatever else was buried at Mathon, it is certain that in 1910, Mr. Hodges found in the sand pit, on his land at Southend Farm, what proved to be a Bronze Age cemetery. Fifteen interments were found, fragments of cinerary urns, two bronze lance heads, and a 5 inch bronze disc, possibly the central boss of a shield. Twenty or more interments had been removed before the experts arrived. Brian Smith5 suggests that the site was used for an exceptionally long period, probably a thousand years. Unfortunately, this archaeological discovery was not professionally excavated, or valuable information might have been obtained about these inhabitants of the district over 3000 years ago. The 1904 Ordnance Survey map shows a small group of “stones” by the stream below Warner’s Farm. One of these remains in the undergrowth near the brook. The others have disappeared, probably removed to avoid hampering farming operations. It is grey and about the size of a milestone. It may or may not be significant that the stones lay in a straight line between the Bronze Age cemetery and the church.

The parish has footpaths in plenty, between hamlets and farms, but there is no main road, no canal, and a railway which was planned in the 19th Century, between Worcester and Hereford, passing through Netherley, was never built. The River Rundle or Cradley Brook is fed by several springs and streams, and the plentiful supply of pure water, and the fertility of the soil no doubt had much to do with the choice of site of the village many years ago.

Footnotes:

  1. Paymasters were village officials, churchwardens, surveyors of the roads, constable, overseers of the poor, haywarden.
  2. Nash, History of Worcestershire 1782.
  3. Ekwall, Oxford Dictionary of Place Names 1966.
  4. Laird, A Topographical and Historical Description of the County of Worcestershire, Undated, In Worcester Record Office County Hall
  5. Brian Smith, History of Malvern 1978

‘The Cliffe Arms’, a social centre for many years. ‘Also it is agreed that it shall be a dinner provided at Thomas Ravenhill at the Cliffe Arms Inn on Easter Monday next (1826) for the 12 paymasters of the parish, the expenses not to exceed £3’.

You will pay a little more now.

The Mediaeval Period

In the absence of written records, fixing the date of the founding of a village is never easy. We certainly cannot assume that the site was continuously occupied from the Bronze Age, through the Iron Age and Roman times. A hoard of Iron Age bars, the basic working material for tools and weapons, was found in 1856 near the Wyche, and it is now known that the Iron Age communities were far more widespread, numerous and advanced than had previously been realised. J. & M. West1 estimate the Iron Age population of Herefordshire at 30,000. The Romans too are known to have been near here, at Stretton Grandison for example, where there was a fort and settlement, as well as the Roman road cutting straight across country from the south-east. Recent aerial photographs have revealed the existence of a Roman marching camp in the neighbouring village of Cradley, created by troops in transit, when they made a defensive rampart around their camp for the night. Also Roman coins have been found in the parish, but neither they nor the Iron Age bars are sufficient evidence to assume continuity of occupation during these years, though some day, excavation may reveal the presence of people living in this area at the time. Lacking archaeological evidence of this, we must look for indications of habitation during the Anglo-Saxon period.

The village itself has an Old English name, and Rowburrow and Bagburrow take their names from the Anglo-Saxon ‘bearu’ - a wood. Names ending in ‘ley’ (from ‘leah’) such as Netherley, Overley and Farley suggest that the village was probably founded during these years. The names signify clearings made in the forest by the settlers, Netherley the lower, and Overley the higher clearings and Farley the fern clearing on the high ground of Mathon Park.

The reasons for the choice of site are not hard to see. The soil is fertile, and due to the streams, springs and wells, water is pure and abundant. Some householders still use the wells which have served for hundreds of years. Serious flooding is rare, so that dry sites for houses could readily be found. William Cobbett2 had a great deal to say about how much better off labouring people were in well-wooded districts like Herefordshire where wood was easily available for fuel. But he could also have pointed out the benefit of a good water supply, rather than having to walk to a distant well or pond, where both supply and cleanliness were of doubtful value.

The church contains Norman work of the 11th Century, and though there is no church listed for Mathon in Domesday Book, a priest is mentioned, which is usually taken to mean that there was church. Also it has been suggested that the remains of an apse3 were found below the present chancel. If this is so, it may be that a previous Christian or pre-Christian building existed on this site.

In 1086, when the Domesday Book was compiled, Mathon was one of the many manors owned by Pershore Abbey. The abbey had been re-founded as a Benedictine Abbey in 972 and land in Worcester and Gloucester was given to it by a charter of King Edgar. This charter was signed by the king, by Archbishop Dunstan of Canterbury, Bishop Aethelwold of Winchester, and Oswald, Archbishop of York and Bishop of Worcester. The abbey had a stormy early history, having been plundered by the Danes and damaged by fire. In spite of these hardships, the black-gowned monks led their lives of poverty, obedience and chastity, worked in garden, field and mill, built churches, and acted as missionaries to convert the heathen. They travelled around the countryside preaching the gospel, often in the open air at preaching crosses. There is a stone near the South Porch of the church, said to be the remains of a preaching cross4, and this may be where the monks held their service before the church was built, having made the long journey from Pershore through the wild heavily forested country. The magnificent yew tree which stands close by certainly dates to mediaeval times. King Edward I encouraged the planting of yews in churchyards.

The ecclesiastical parish boundaries were laid down before the Conquest. Theodore, Archbishop of Canterbury began to divide the country into dioceses and parishes in the 7th Century. Mathon’s boundary started from the hills and followed the stream westward down the hillside by the edge of Park Wood, along the course of an ancient track which Brian Smith5 says has been used since Anglo-Saxon times. It came from the river crossing at Clevelode and the Rhydd, along Wood Street, and over the hills and down the Purlieu Lane into Herefordshire, the line of an old salt road. The boundary crosses Brockhill Road and continues still by the stream and through the woods to cross the Mathon-Colwall road. At certain places as was the custom, the 1904 6 inch Ordnance Survey map shows prominent trees, usually oak, no doubt for their longevity, to mark the boundary at that point. At its other extremity as the boundary returns to the hills, it includes the district which was known as Mathon Urban, now West Malvern.

In 1014, Ethelred II granted to Earldorman Leofwine 4 mansae (lodges) in Mathon, “free from every yoke of service, three things excepted, to wit, national military service, the construction of fortresses and the building of bridges”. Unfortunately there is no information on the boundaries of this estate, but we do know that it was of 4 hides (480 acres).

Domesday Book gives the first solid information about the parish. We know that much of the land belonged to Pershore Abbey, that there was a priest, a reeve6 and a smith. The infamous Urso d’Habitot, ancestor of the Beauchamps and Sheriff of Worcester for 20 years, held three virgates of land (90 acres). He had stolen so much church land that Ealdred, Archbishop of York said of him “Highest thou Urse, have thou God’s curse”. This land was in Doddingtree hundred.

One hide was in Radlow hundred in Hereford. Before 1066 this land had been held by Alfward and Merwin, thanes of Earl Oda, but after the Conquest, they lost their freedom and the land was held by Aethelhelm and Odo, the tenants of Drogo, son of Poyntz and Roger de Lacy respectively.

Walter Ponther (or Poer) held a virgate of land (30 acres), all of which was waste. Victoria County History7 considers that this is Farley manor in Mathon Park. William Power, a member of this family, was presented at the Assizes in 1274 for making a warren in Farley, and in 1287 the Earl of Gloucester sued him for enclosing a park there to the detriment of Malvern Chase. William was able to show that his father, also William, had made the park, and that the father of the Earl had given him deer to stock it, but by 1287 they had all been eaten by wolves. This was apparently a late date for wolves to be found in England, so perhaps the deer had also suffered from two-legged predators.

Domesday Book has another entry, under ‘Bagburrow’, which concerns Mathon. Some entries in Domesday cannot be directly related to existing villages. At the time that the report was made, what William’s officials were describing was a loosely knit farming district of houses and farmsteads. This is exactly what Bagburrow was and still is. The land was the property of the Canons of Hereford and was in Winstree hundred. There were 5 hides, 2 mills, and a share in a salt house in Droitwich. The share in the salt house, a very valuable perquisite, is considered to have been obtained by manors which provided firewood for drying the salt, and so obtained the supplies essential to health and for the preservation of meat for winter.

In all Domesday Book lists three water mills in the parish. One mill, represented by the present Mill House, was working in the 19th Century, and a mill house and mill stone are also in existence at Hall Court, an 18th Century house which stands below Bagburrow Hill and only a quarter of a mile away from the Mill House. Another mill site can be identified below Warner’s Farm at Horsehole, where the 1840 map shows a field named Mill Field, and part of the stream Old Mill Race. Similarly near Old Country Farm, there is a field named Mill Meadow. The mill was a most important part of the medieval economy. The lord insisted on having all corn ground at his own mill, and taking his quota, while the miller was suspected of doing the same without official blessing.

The little streams which mark the parish boundary, or which drove the mills, now look too small and weed-choked for their task for most of the year. In medieval times, they were kept thoroughly weed-free, in accordance with their importance to the farming system of the time. The mills themselves were very small. Professor Hoskins8 has compared their power to that of a small motor car but as he says, they were the only medieval tool which did not rely solely on human or animal muscle power.

At this time, there seem to have been, in the parish, 17 villagers, or villeins, and 16 small-holders or bordarers. It is thought that the villeins farmed about 30 acres each and the bordarers 5 acres. They all had duties to perform for the lord of the manor, in this case represented by the reeve, who allocated the daily work. Ploughing the lord’s land, washing and shearing sheep, carting loads or manure and harvested crops were typical tasks, and very irksome they must have been to men who had been free before the Conquest and now had to leave their own land to work for the lord.

The open fields of the village can still be identified from the 1840 Tithe map. They lie between Church Farm, Moorend Cross, and the Old Country Farm, and are named Red Field, Broad Field and Butt Field. These are the fields where the villagers had their strips of land, scattered throughout the field so that each had his share of the best soil. Each man’s long strip of half an acre or acre was called a ridge or land and was turned by the plough into a raised rounded shape and separated from his neighbour’s by a ditch to drain off the water. For several days a week, he worked under the direction of the reeve, on the church land, and the first vicar, Thomas de Badminton probably worked beside him. The meadows for hay or grazing were shared out in a similar way. It seems likely that Red Field, the largest of the three, (60 acres) would have been used for arable crops, the others for hay or grazing. The villagers ploughed with their ox teams, gathered their crops at harvest time, and from them paid their tithe to the parson for the maintenance of the church. In 1840, Red Field was still divided into strips, and although the owners were still large farmers, one or two smallholders still owned land there9.

Mathon is one of the parishes where there were those officials known as ‘radmen’ or ‘radknights’10. They were found mainly on the Welsh border, and were of superior status, owing light services to the lord, as carriers or mounted escorts.

There are several ‘hollow ways’ in the village, unmade roads where the surface has been carried away as mud on the wheels of waggons, the hooves of horses, or men’s boots. Some of them appear on the 1840 Tithe map to have been of equal importance to the roads which were later surfaced and became our modern lanes. One of these hollow ways runs from the village street by the house called “Parker’s” heading directly up Rowburrow Hill in the direction of West Malvern. This is by village tradition, a salt way. Another, called ‘Quab Lane’11, starts near the back entrance of Mathon Court and goes north-west to Overley Cottages and Netherley Farm, passing through the small field called Nobody’s Acre, which from its name, must have been disputed land at one time. At the edge of the field is an imposing hedgebank, which may have been a farm or estate boundary. Another hollow way leads from Warner’s Farm to the stream near Horsehole, which was for many years, the site of a smithy. It is not hard to imagine the horses being led down the lane to drink at the stream and be shod. From the same place, yet another hollow way leads from the stream up the hill to Red Field.

Leading from the church car park is the hollow way known as the ‘Roman Road’. It begins in a southerly direction for a quarter mile, then meets a footpath from Moorend Cross which continues over the stream and up the hill to Warner’s Farm. The hollow way is so straight and broad for the first quarter mile, that it is easy to see how it acquired its name. It is certainly a very ancient track, and only excavation could determine its age. It leads directly to Red Field, the village arable field, to which heavy loads of bulky manures had to be transported, and harvested crops brought to the village, so it is not suprising that the wagon wheels cut deeply. After meeting the footpath from Moorend Cross the hollow way continues south as a wide and much over-grown ditch along the edge of the open field. It could possibly in the past have been a much more direct route to the important farms at Southend, South Hide and Old Country. One of the largest farms in the parish, Shipping House, mentioned in the 14th Century12, was situated at South Hide, and was owned by the Cliffe family, until it was burnt down in the 19th Century.

Church Farm and Moat Farm were moated sites. These are not uncommon in England, and are found as frequently in East Anglia as in the West Midlands so there is no connection with marauding armies of Welshmen. However they may have been useful against some of the thieves and vagabonds who were common in these lawless times. The sites are usually associated with heavy land and the moats may have been helpful for drainage purposes. It has been suggested that they were popular amongst prosperous farmers who wished to copy the nobility with their moated castles - a mediaeval status symbol. They were mostly made in the 13th Century and it is thought that few were constructed after 1500.

After the Norman Conquest, King William seized for his own use great areas of forest in which he and his nobles could enjoy the hunting of the deer which was their delight. Severe laws applied to these forests, and anyone harming the king’s deer was subject to death or mutilation. Farmers living in the forest area must not allow their hedges to grow higher than the armpit of an inspecting verderer, nor could they drive off the deer which jumped the hedges to feast on their crops. The gathering of wood for fuel or building was strictly controlled as was the grazing of farm animals in the forest. Dogs were inspected, and “such dogs as are found that may or will not be drawen through a strap of 18 inches and a barleycorn in length and breadth shall be hombled”. Part of the foot was cut away so that the dogs might not injure the deer by clawing them.

In 1290, the Red Earl, Earl of Clare, Hertford and Gloucester married Princess Joan d’Acres, daughter of Edward I, and received as part of the honour of Gloucester, a gift of Malvern Forest and the smaller forest of Cors adjoining it. As only the property of the king could be described as a forest, they were immediately disafforested and from that day ranked as chases, but unhappily for the inhabitants forest laws were still enforced. The chase was said by the monk, William of Malmesbury to be “so much overrun with wood as to be a wilderness”. Its boundaries are not known in detail, but we are told that it extended in length from the River Teme in the north, to Cors Forest in the south, and from the River Severn on the east to the top of Malvern Hill on the west. The administrative headquarters of the chase were at Hanley Castle. Soon after the land was acquired by the earl, a great quarrel broke out between him and the Bishop of Hereford about their boundaries, and the earl caused the ditch known as the Shire Ditch or Red Earl’s ditch to be made along the crest of the hills to divide their lands and to mark the boundary between the shires. It is said that he made the ditch on the slope of the hill in such a way that the deer could readily leap over it into his land but only with great difficulty jump back into the Bishop’s. Mathon was one of the thirteen parishes with land in the chase, and the forest laws must have restricted the breaking of more farming land and house-building for hundreds of years. However, as people always have, the villagers must have learned to make the best of it. They were able to gather fallen wood for fuel, and they had rights of grazing for their cattle on the common land in the chase. For this the Townships of Mathon and Colwall gave 8 quarters of oats and all the customary tenants did 383 bendrips in Autumn (extra reaping for the lord of the manor).

In 1327, Edward III, a boy of 15, who depended on his mother and her lover, the scheming Marcher lord, Mortimer for guidance, needed to re-coup his finances after an unsuccessful campaign against the Scots. He ordered a tax to be collected which was called the Lay Subsidy, and we gain a valuable glimpse of the village from the people who paid it.

Lay Subsidy Rolls Edward III 1327
De Rogero de Hanley XIId. 
De Stephano att Well XIId.
De Willelmo Le Blake Xd.
De Alicia Farleye XIId.
De Johann Le Mercer IIIIs. 
De Ricardo Hug IIs. 
De Galfrydo Dobyn VIIId. 
De Johanne Le Blake Xd.
De Ricardo in the Home Xvd.
De Willelmo Hed IIs.
De Johanne atte Egge Xd.
De Henrico atte Toune XVIIId.
De Ricardo de Bictheleye VId.
De Adam de la Mor IId.
De Willelmo de Putlewyke VIId.
De Willelmo de Farleye VId.
De Ricardo atte Mulle XIId.
De Johanne de Blake XIId.
De Willelmo Fabro VIIId.

 
Unfortunately these records are not considered reliable as a population guide, since so many people were too poor to pay the tax, and others avoided paying, a situation which six hundred years later still seems oddly familiar. It is interesting to note that there are two people named Farley. Farley juxta Mathon, to give its full name, was a manor in the Mathon Park area. By 1840, it had almost disappeared - all that remained was a pound in which stray animals were kept until claimed. This was located on Harcourt Road, opposite Mathon Lodge.

Ricardo in the home was the owner of the farm at Ham Green, and Henrico atte Towne held Town House Farm, Ricardo atte Mulle was the miller, and Adam de la Mor farmed Moorend. Johann Le Mercer was the wealthy man of the village, having paid 4 shillings tax. He owned a virgate of land in Farley in 1305. There was obviously a range of wealth in the parish. Galfrydo Dobyn seems to have had a descendant who in 1684 witnessed William Cliffe’s will. His name was Robert Dobyns. If it is the same family, this is an exceptionally long time for a family to survive in a parish, the more usual period being 3 or 4 generations. It is probably the same family that gave the name to the present Dobbin’s farm and to the fields called Dobbins meadow and Lower Dobbins on the Tithe Map. Willelmo Fabro was the Smith, that vital member of every community until 1900, at least.

  1. J. & M. West, History of Herefordshire , 1985
  2. William Corbett, Rural Rides, 1821
  3. Royal Commission on Historic Monuments, Herefordshire East 1931
  4. Alternatively, it may have been a Churchyard cross. Before gravestones were made in the 17th Century, each churchyard had a cross, to hallow the ground.
  5. Brian Smith, History Of Malvern , 1978
  6. A reeve was an important official of the lord of the manor - a bailiff.
  7. Victoria County History - Worcester.
  8. W. G. Hoskins, The Making of the English Landscape, 1955
  9. It seems likely that there was also a common field at Old Country - Inchley Field.
  10. The name survives - personal communication from Miss A. Roadknight.
  11. Quab means ‘boggy’.
  12. “A virgate of land called ‘Shepenhouse’ in South Hide, held by Thomas Hunte who was wanted for felony 1404, Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous Vol 7 1399 - 1422.

Tudors & Stuarts

For much of its history, Mathon gives the impression of going quietly on irrespective of outside events.  But during the 16th and 17th Centuries two events did have a profound influence on the village.  The first was the Reformation and the second the disafforestation of Malvern Chase.

Mathon Church was originally dedicated to St. Margaret by its 11th Century builders.  The County historian, Nash, writing in the 18th Century, says “The church of Mathon, which is dedicated to St. Margaret, with the portion of Chokenhall, were appropriated to the Abbey of Pershore 19th June 1512, and the Vicarage appointed”.  Appropriation means that the abbey received the tithes of the Manor of Mathon, and the right to appoint a vicar, in return taking the responsibility of providing a vicarage and maintaining the Chancel.  It would have been a valuable addition to the Abbey’s finances.  There were three vicars in the year 1512, and we can guess that the first of them, Johannes Russell did not meet with the approval of the abbey, but why their nominee, Hugo Myles should have been so quickly replaced by Roger Hughes, we cannot  tell.

Pershore Abbey was not to enjoy the financial advantage of the Appropriation for long however, as King Henry VIII had begun systematically depriving the church of its wealth, a process which he continued until death took him “where kings can steal no more”!1 In doing so, he may have abolished some practices by abbots and monks that were unworthy of their saintly vocation, but he also swept away the wonderful hospitality which monasteries provided for travellers and the poor, and their influence on literature and learning.  During this period, the dedication of the church was changed to St. John the Baptist.  There are two possible explanations.  The first is that it was an attempt to hide thefts of Church lands and rents, so that if anyone asked what had happened to the rents of St. Margaret’s, Mathon, he would be told that there was no such church, and that Mathon Church was dedicated to St. John.  The second, more likely explanation is that the new dedication was more in keeping with the spirit of the Reformation, and with the tendency to move away from the Church of Rome, and foreign influence, and place increased importance on scriptural tradition.  When Pershore Abbey was dissolved, Mathon Church and Manor passed into the hand of the Dean and Chapter of Westminster, and in the 19th Century to the Church Commissioners, who still own much of the parish.

Some idea of the wealth of small country churches can be gained from the following inventory of the possessions of Mathon Church made in 1536:-

Mathan  Aug 9  1 chalys of sylver and gylte weying XX unces, a pyx of sylver weying IIJ (3) unces, IJ (2) copies of redd velvett, a chesable of blew velvett, with albes thereunto, a crosse of copper, a censer of copper, a lampe of latten, IJ (2) candlesticks of latten, a tennacle of brasse, IIIJ (4) bells in the steeple, a saunce bell, a lyche bell, a sacryng bell, item.; they say they have J other chalyce weying VII unces, and remaineth in the hands of Ric. Cave in gage for XXs. of him borrowed and bestowed upon harness (armour).

Will Packer  Vicar

After the theft of the monastery wealth, and following the death of Henry VIII, it was obviously thought worth enquiring what additional valuables might be taken from parish churches.  It will be noticed that the church still retained various articles connected with the previous membership of the Catholic church.  The reference to the steeple is either a slip, or a figure of speech.  Mathon never had such a steeple.

The loan of twenty shillings, a considerable sum in those days, made by Richard Cave to the church, suggests that the parish had experienced difficulty in providing a soldier and arming him, and had been obliged to ask for help from a wealthy parishioner, who had retained the chalice which had provided surety.

The second event to affect the village occurred about one hundred years later.  Malvern Chase, during the 13th Century the property of the Red Earl, had reverted to the crown, and in 1628 King Charles I, anxious to raise money without calling Parliament, had the Chase surveyed, and decided to give up his forest rights and take one third of the common land in lieu.  The rest of the land was intended to be available to all in perpetuity, and local people could retain their grazing rights which they had held for centuries.  The king sold his one third of the land immediately, and some farms and cottages were built there.  This was a prosperous period in which many houses were built or re-built in the countryside, and which is known to historians as the “Great Re-building of Rural England”.  The parish records contain an interesting description of the vicarage at Church Farm, in two glebe terriers dated 1585 and 1616.  Glebe terriers were descriptions of houses and land belonging to the church, and not only do they give a description of the vicarage, but they also tell us something about the local farmhouses, which were similar.

The 1585 terrier reads:  A True Presentment of the Glebe land of the Parsonage of Mathon with all houses thereto belonging.

In primis, a fair mansion house, viz, a parlour, a hall, a kitchen with chambers, and divers (several) other houses adjoining to the same, all within the moat and one little house without the moat on the north side.

Item.  A large barn, a stable and a fair large sheepin so called, a gatehouse upon the bridge.

Item.  Two meadows being 7 acres or thereabouts, two closes of pasture being 5 acres or thereabouts, two other closes now arable land being 22 acres, all adjoining to the Parsonage house or mansion place, and all inclosed adjoining together.

The sheepin is the word variously written as shippon, shippen or shipping meaning a cattle shed.  It is likely that this house was many years old when it was described in 1585, and was in fact the house which belonged to William Mucklow, and which he agreed to make into a vicarage in 1550.  This is how the house was described in 1616.

Glebe Terrier 1616

One hall, one parlour, one kitchen, one dey house (dairy), one water house, one lower chamber near unto the parlour, one boulteinge house (boulteinge - a machine for separating grain and bran) one chamber over the hall, one chamber over the parlour, one chamber over the kitchen, one closet over the deyhouse, one chamber over the buttery, one chamber over the parlour chamber, one chamber behind the kitchen chimney, two draughts (draught - a privy or cess pit).  One new barn containing three bays, one stable thereunto adjoining, and one poultry house.

By 1616, the vicarage had either been re-built or extensively improved.  The earlier terrier makes no mention of upstairs rooms, and the house may have had an extra floor built in, creating bedrooms, and a flight of stairs provided.  This was a favourite way of improving a mediaeval hall type house.  Alternatively, it may have been at this time that the house was re-built outside the moat, which in more settled times, probably proved to be unnecessary for security, and rather restricting.

The document also gives a description of the glebe land - “To the Broad Field on the north side, to the piece of pasture ground called the Long Leasow on the east side, to the Lower Stallockmore or Stall Meadow and on the west side to the highway going from Mooreens (Moorend) Cross to Hackneels Cross (Hackney Cross).  By 1840, the Tithe Report mentions only Broad Field.  The other names seem to have gone out of use.

A great deal of building was done in the parish this century.  Parker’s, a timber-framed house in the village street bears the date 1610 carved on the front, and most of the other buildings and cottages have been dated to the 17th Century, with the exception of Bank Farm, said to be 16th Century.  Green wood was used for the main framework of the houses.  Heavy baulks were required to minimise twisting as the wood dried out.  The Cliffe Arms, and Town House both have cruck end frames, bent trees halved along their length and used to make an ‘A’ frame for the gable end.  Crucks were thought to be very ancient and were dated to the 13th Century, but it is now known that the system continued for another three or four centuries.  The framework was made by the carpenter in his yard, and the heavy timbers mortised and tenoned together dry, then each joint marked with chisel-cut Roman numeral for later assembly on the site, when the joints were pegged with heart of oak.  Neighbours were called in to erect the frames, often with lavish expenditure of food and drink.  Most of the houses were named after their first owners.  Badger’s is a particularly interesting name, since a badger, as well as the familiar animal, was also the name of a licensed dealer in grain.  There was a John Badger living in the village in 1619, who may have built the house, and who may have been such a dealer, and whose name may have been acquired from an ancestor in the corn trade.

For a village in a county which suffered as severely as Worcestershire did during the Civil War, Mathon seems to have  escaped fairly lightly.  However, there is a strong tradition in the village that a skirmish took place on Red Field, which is sometimes known locally as the ‘Field of Blood’.  The dead are supposed to have been buried where they fell.  I have been unable to find any mention of this action in written records, but that does not mean that it did not take place.  There were large numbers of troops in the area, some of whom were quartered in Mathon.  Disputes between soldiers and those upon whom they are billeted are frequently reported, arising from stolen and damaged property.  The parish records contain the  following list of village people claiming damages against the unpaid Parliamentary army of Scots who were billeted here.
 

Parish Accounts 1647

Thomas Dangerfield    8 men and 10 horses  4 days  £2 8s. 0d.
Edmund Whittington    “and lost more by some of the Parliamentary forces in taking  commodities out of my house and two horses from me”.
William Briane    By Capt. Badger’s men, in taking commodities out of my houses and breaking  my glass window.
Edmund Poole    Losses by the Scots, 22 lambes and 2 wethers valued (at the least) at £4
Thomas Godfrey    Plundering of apparell
Richard Willmoore    Apparell and other commodities
William Thomas    1 horse valued at £4
James James    Bacon, beef, and other commodities.  A gun valued at 12s.
William Hall    Beef, bacon, cheese apparell and all kind of household stuff  £30

Signed by all the above, (some made their marks) and also by Thomas Adams, Richard Taylor, John Falkes, John Rosse, Richard Hodges, Peter Hartland, Edward Harbert, William Collins, John Green, Willian Vobe.  Whether these men ever succeeded in their claim, the parish records do not reveal.  Thomas Dangerfield seems to have supported the Parliamentary side, for he ends his claim with “besides what satisfaction I had in it.”

The Worcester Quarter Sessions Rolls for 1591 - 1643 suggest that Mathon was on the whole a law-abiding community.  There are not a great many entries but some of them give some idea of the village people of that time.

1637    Roger Robinson, shoemaker, was indicted for selling 230 pairs of boots made of  horse hides, instead of the customary cow hides.

1620    Permission was given to the Vicar and inhabitants of Mathon to collect alms for a poor man, Nicholas Taylor, who lost his house and goods by fire.

Permission had to be sought for a cash collection of any kind.  In this case, Nicholas seems to have suffered a misfortune which was probably not uncommon in the timber-framed houses of the 17th Century, with their open fires.

1634    Roland Hope, gentleman, of Mathon, for not working in the repair of the highways on the appointed days, and making default with one small cart with oxen, horses or other beasts.

Since a ‘gentleman’ was not normally expected to work with his hands, perhaps Roland’s omission was in not sending the small cart.  It is also interesting to notice the reference to oxen as draught animals.

1608    Two persons sell ale without licence in Mathon.

1609    Richard Sadler, the younger, of Mathon, tanner, to keep the peace towards Thomas Sadler, of Leigh. Was this a family quarrel?

1610    Indictment of Henry Whooper, of Mathon, clerk, for breaking and entering the close  (field) of Richard Case of Mathon.

1615    William Vobe, yeoman, indicated for grazing horses, cows and sheep on the close of Anthony Sydnall and Anthony Halle.  (The Grove)

Both these charges suggest that the land may have been enclosed quite recently.  Perhaps there was some resentment by Whooper and Vobe.

1619    14 men and one woman indicted for riotously assembling and assaulting three bailiffs of William Berkeley. Was this an eviction which was resisted by the villagers?

1619    3 Mathon men indicted for riotously assembling and assaulting Richard Turner.  (Not a true bill)

1627    Another riotous assembly and assault.

1629    John Harbert - a theft from Richard Unet.

1633    Indictment of William Thomas of Mathon, yeoman, for disseizing Celia James of the possession of her dwelling house at Mathon.

1634    Luke Staunton, victualler, drinking at unlawful hours, and for inordinate terms on festival days. By standards of English country life in those times, Luke must have been on a considerable celebration to have been taken to court.

1634    John Gregg, Constable of Mathon, reported that watch and ward had been kept, that the highways and bridges were in good repair till the last sudden rain, that none harboured rogues, and that there were no (unlicensed) taverners, vintners, butchers or bakers.

    This was all part of the routine report that the Constable was required to make as part of his yearly duty.

1634    Roger Robinson, Constable of Mathon, that Luke Staunton keeps an alehouse without licence.

    The Constable was chosen yearly.  It was an onerous duty, and one that everyone seems to have tried hard to avoid, though a refusal to officiate meant a considerable fine. Roger himself was charged three years later with making boots from horse hides.

1636    Presentment of Luke Staunton, vitualler of Mathon, for suffering the parishioners of the same town to be continually drinking at all seasons whole nights and days together.

1636    Edward Harbert of Mathon, husbandman, for his appearance at Sessions to answer for not appearing at monthly meetings, he being Constable of Mathon.

At the end of Queen Elizabeth’s reign, Mathon must have been a green land, the primitive roads lined with fruit trees, and oaks still plentiful.

In the Civil War, a London militiaman gave “testimony of the high reputation of the county, (Worcs.) for fruit, and spoke enthusiastically of the loaded apple and pear trees overhanging even the public highways.”2  Cider, which had already been enjoyed for hundreds of years was made, and the surplus which was not consumed on the farm, usually as part of the men’s wages, was sold.  The red-streaked apple discovered by Lord Scudamore growing wild in a field near Holme Lacey, was a favourite cider apple, and the Barland pear, named after a field in the neighbouring parish of Bosbury was the choice for perry, made since the 14th Century.  Both varieties of fruit gave their names to fields in Mathon.

At the end of the 17th Century, Celia Fiennes3 wrote “On the other side (of the Malverns) is Herefordshire, which appears to be a county of gardens and orchards, the whole county being full of fruit trees.  It looks like nothing else, the apple and pear trees are so thick, even in their corn fields and hedge rows”.  It was also famous for its oaks, which stretched for miles, and for the Herefordshire school of woodworkers, who were responsible for such craftwork as the Mathon church roof.  It was probably at about this time that hops, imported from the Low Countries in the 15th Century, began to be grown in the parish.  They were increasingly used for beer, which was replacing in popularity the old English ale, and farmers were tempted to grow them by the high price which they fetched in the market.  Mathon Whites were the hops which perhaps made the parish name more widely known than anything else in its history.  Hops were planted 5-8 feet apart, allowing a plough to be used between rows.  Poles 13-16 feet long, probably grown on the farm’s ash bed, were used to support them, and the bines were tied with rushes or grass.  At harvest time, hop-picking provided the women with the chance to supplement the family income, which must have been welcome, because even allowing for the low prices of those days, wages seem incredibly low.  These are the average wages for the district4.

 
1663    Bailiff    £4 per annum
    Labourer     3d. to 6d. per day (with food and drink)
    Women     4d. per day
    Thatcher or Carpenter    6d. per day
    Maidservant    £1 10s. per annum

Fortunately, the whole country was becoming aware of the need for legislation to provide care for the poor and elderly, and various well-meaning efforts were made to ensure that the necessary help was given, and that paupers did not have to live on charity alone.  In 1662, an Act of Parliament had provided for the appointment by the men holding the two ancient offices, the Constable and Churchwardens, of Overseers for the Poor, who were empowered to levy a parish rate for that purpose.  The parish books commencing in the 17th Century, contain accounts of these parish officers or paymasters as they sometimes called themselves.  The Act of Parochial Settlement laid down that anyone residing 40 days in a parish should be regarded as belonging to it, and therefore became a charge upon the parish if he fell out of work.  Parish officials were charged with ensuring that “no vagrants were harbouring” and because of this anxiety to incur no extra expense, mobility of labour was almost non-existent for almost 200 years.  Under the 1691 Act, a man could claim a settlement in a parish by birth, by living in a tenement with a yearly value of £10, by paying parish rates, by serving a year in a public office, by completing an apprenticeship, or by obtaining a hiring.  In practice, employers hired for a few days short of a year to avoid a claim for settlement.  A woman could claim settlement by marriage.

The Overseer’s Account for 1681 gives an idea of the number of people in the parish who were being given assistance, and how much they received.

    John Corbett    48 weeks @ 6d. per week
    Thomas Mason    48 weeks @ 9d. per week
    Widow Bayliss    £2
    Widow Balding    26 weeks @ 1s. 6d. per week
    Widow Falks    44 weeks @ 9d. per week
    Widow Onions    £1 4s. 6d.
    Widow Harbert    48 weeks @ 1s. per week
    Thomas Mason    4s. 4d.
    An old man at Widow Bayliss’s house     6d.
    John Farmer    1s.6d.  
 
 

In 1691, charges for building a house for John Farmer amounted to £6 4s. 4d.

The parish registers suggest that Mathon fared reasonably well in the plague-ridden Tudor and Stuart times.  Yearly deaths never rose higher than 14, and the average age was 7.  It was a time when there were many cases of poverty and hardship which defied well-meaning charitable efforts, and sometimes resulted from the tendency to hurry paupers, unemployed or sick people on to their own parishes, in order to avoid a mounting parish rate for people who themselves could not afford to pay more.  Some of the Vicar’s comments, in the Register of Deaths shows his kindly feeling for these poor folk.

    ‘A poor parentless lad’    ‘A poor traveller’
    ‘A poor strange wandering boy’

1.    G. M. Trevelyan,  English Social History
2.    Quoted in R. C. Gaut,  History of Worcs. Agriculture & Rural Evolution  1939.
3.    Celia Fiennes,  The Journeys of Celia Fiennes , ed.  Trevelyan  1947.
4.    Gaut, as above.
 
 

Two Influential Families

The Cliffes and Dangerfields were two families of typical Midland yeoman, some of them aspiring to that much-loved rank of Old England, a ‘gentleman’, and bearing coats of arms.  Both families had branches in nearby towns, the Dangerfields in Bromyard and the Cliffes at Great Witley, the home of Alan Cliffe, who was High Sheriff of Worcester in 1692.  The memorial tablets in Mathon Church exhibit their coats of arms.  The Cliffe pedigree had been inspected by the Heralds in 1634.  Whether the two families made an appearance when the Heralds re-visited in 1660 is not known.  The purpose of these officials was ‘to correct and reform all arms, crests, cognizances and devices unlawfully borne and assumed’.  It seems that sometimes, as at Oxford, in 1669, the gentlemen had lost interest in establishing their claim to gentle birth and pedigree, preferring to attend a horse race that was being run nearby.

Both families were living in the village early in the 17th Century.  They held the various offices of the parish, and were present at each other’s family occasions.  Both families used a few well-tried Christian names and had the habit of naming sons after fathers, which makes tracing relationships difficult.  There was a wide range of education and wealth in each family, their signatures ranging from elegant italic handwriting to those of men more used to holding a hoe than a quill pen.  In the Hearth Tax returns of 1662, where hearths were used as a measure of wealth, the number of their fireplaces ranged from 4 to 1.  Both families prospered during the 250 or so years they lived in Mathon.  In 1684, William Cliffe had not very much to pass on to his children when he wrote his will, but he remembered the village folk among whom he had spent his life.
    “In the name of God, Amen.  I, William Cliffe, of the parish of Mathon, in the County of Worcester, gent., doe make and ordeyne this my last will and testament as followeth.  In primis, I give to my daughter, Pitt, five pounds, item, I give to my son William Cliffe of Dod Oak, five pounds, item, I give to my grand-daughter (unnamed) the wife of William Cliffe of the parish of Astly, five pounds, item, I give to the poor of the parish of Mathorne, where I live, and where I intend to be buried, five pounds, and I constitute and appoint my son, Henry Cliffe, who liveth with me, my sole executor ....

Witnessed by Robert Dobyns, John Chandler, and another whose signature is unreadable.

William’s possessions amounted to £84, but this was about average for a yeoman farmer of this period.

In 1652, the Manor of Farley was sold by Henry Bromley and Edward Pennell to Thomas Dangerfield, Susan Fawke and George Wood.  The manor stayed in the Dangerfield family for almost two hundred years.  Thomas Dangerfield, who died in 1735, had many possessions and farm stock amounting to more than £500, and the inventory of his goods fills several pages, closely written.  Some of the Dangerfields are described on their memorials as ‘of the Park, gent.’, some as ‘of the Spout (farm) gent.’  Most of the family farmed land in the Ham Green, Harcourt Road, and Mathon Park area, and it was in this district that the Spout Farm, now no longer in existence, was located, near Mathon Lodge.

Three of the Dangerfields, George, Henry and William were involved in the bitter quarrel with the Vicar, Tychicus Whiting, whose memorial tablet is placed above the South Door of the Church, as though still surveying those who enter and weighing them in the balance.  He himself was the subject of a long letter of complaint sent by the parishioners to the Bishop of Worcester in 1745, listing “crimes and enormities committed by him.”  He seems to have been a very quarrelsome man, who flew into a violent temper on the least excuse, and on numerous occasions “used threatening words of battery against some of the parish, and assaulted one man in the churchyard, Joseph Boneale by name.”  Quarrels seem to have occurred in the church and in the churchyard before during and after service.  However, although fifteen outraged people signed the letter to the Bishop, the signatories including Abraham Crouch, himself a previous Vicar of Mathon, (1681 - 1703) Tychicus survived it all, and remained vicar until 1772.

Two of the Cliffe family were ordained, Allen, who was one of the parish officials in 1805, and William, (1717 - 1742) whose name appears on a memorial in the church, and who is buried in Westminster Abbey.

By 1840, the only surviving members of the Dangerfield family who owned land in the parish were Mary and Margaret, who held 79 and 103 acres respectively, most of which was farmed by Hannah Jones and Thomas Wood.

The Cliffes, on the other hand, had reached the summit of their power by this time.  Nash1, writing in 1782, said that the “Beauchamps, Barons of Powick, had antiently lands and a park in this parish, which is the partition of the lands of Sir Richard Beauchamp, the last Baron Powick, among his daughters, came to Anne, who married Richard Lygon and continued in the family of Lygons of Madresfield till sold by them.  The principal landowner is now Mr. Cliffe.”  William Bateson Cliffe is described in the parish book (1823) as Lord of the Manor.  The Tithe Report of 1840 shows that he owned 491 acres, mostly around the family home, Shipping House, near the present South Hide Farm, and was also lessee of the 218 acres owned by Westminster Abbey and farmed by John Jauncey, a member of another family which had lived in the parish for at least 150 years.  The reference to William Cliffe as Lord of the Manor must have been a mistake, or intended as a courtesy to the largest landowner, because the manor belonged to the Dean and Chapter of Westminster, as it had since the dissolution of Pershore Abbey.

At about this time, one of the Cliffe daughters, Eliza Wilhelmina, (1810 - 1848) became friendly with Elizabeth Barrett, who lived with her redoubtable father at Hope End near Ledbury, and who later married Robert Browning.  Eliza was a talented amateur painter, and made a portrait of Elizabeth, and it was on a visit to the Cliffes at Shipping House that Elizabeth had the following experience, which she described in her diary2, “Talking of bulls, as we proceeded on our way to Mathon, we met one coming to meet us in a narrow lane, and with a bellow.  Out of the carriage we all three jumped, and took refuge in a field close by.  But one gate seemed to me by no means as satisfactory go-between for us and our enemy; so I climbed a very high railing with a rather deep ditch at the other side.  At last a man came to our rescue, and drove away the bull, and we got miraculously safe through the frying sun, and over the earth-quaking roads to Mathon.”

After William Bateson Cliffe died, Shipping House was burnt to the ground, and a rambling party from Malvern, which visited the place in 1861 found nothing but ruins.

  1. Nash,  History of Worcs.  1782
  2. Elizabeth Berridge,  The Barretts at Hope End,  1974

Parker’s, a yeoman’s house in the village street, which bears the carved date 1610, and the initials R. M. G.

18th Century

The parish books, containing the accounts of Churchwardens, Constable, Overseers of the Poor, and Surveyors of the Highways provide a window on the life of the parish, but a window which sometimes mists over at critical moments, giving an exciting glimpse and then blurring again. Sometimes what is revealed is comic, occasionally tragic, but most often a view of the everyday lives of the people of this village. The books themselves are stained with damp, and the ink is faded brown, but the writing is usually neat, and if the spelling is sometimes eccentric, they rarely fail to make their meaning clear.

One of the books contains the following inventory of the possessions of the late Thomas Turner, taken by Robert Dangerfield, Thomas Smith and John Spencer, on Feb 7th 1761, as was customary on a person’s death.

In the Kitching
Two stools, one screen, one table, one great chare, one looking glass, one salt box, three earthen platters, one spit, one toaster, one frying pan, a littlebrass kettle, a pair of hand irons, fire shovel and tongs, seven fire hooks, three tranchions, a glass bottle, a bacon crack, a candlestick, a pair of bellows.

In the Pantry
A half hogshead, a washtub, two cupboards, a lanthorn, two pails, two wooden bowls, a ladle, two hogsheads, three tubs, a pair of bedsteads, one bed, three blankets, two pair of sheets, one coffer and a trunk.

Working Tools
One axe, one bill, one thacker, one pike, one spittle, one knife and one ladder.

Wages in the 18th Century were still very low. Gaut1 gives these figures for Pershore, and Mathon’s were probably similar. Unfortunately they were to rise very little, while prices greatly increased towards the end of the century, lowering farm workers’ standard of living.

Day labourer 10d. per day with beer in winter
Carrying hay 1s. per day with board
Harvesting 30s. per month with board
Reaping 2s. 6d. per acre
Mowing 8d. to 1s. per acre
Threshing 1s. to 2s. 8d. per quarter
Yearly earnings Labourer £15 - £16

With wages so low, it was inevitable that any misfortune could make a man and his family a charge upon the parish. In fact, during the period between 1776 and 1803, the Poor rate in England rose from £1.5 million to £4 million2. In 1765, the parish book says that rates were so burthensome that it was decided that the children of those supported by the parish should be apprenticed to the local farmers, who in return were relieved of their share of the rates. The names were drawn out of a well-shaken hat, a gamble for both child and employer. No doubt the results were as varied as the range of human behaviour, and amongst a majority of kind employers, there must have been some who were hard and grasping, just as there must have been some lazy and rebellious children. What seems so sad to us today, is the age at which these children were taken from their homes - from seven years of age. Perhaps some were better fed and housed at the farms than their parents could have done, living as many did in primitive cottages and often with insufficient food and fuel. Mary Stead evidently found her place not to her liking in 1807, when she fled homewards, causing her father to receive a note, that unless he immediately returned her to her employer, his weekly allowance of 3s. 6d. would be stopped by the Overseer of the Poor. In 1765, Susannah (14), Margaret (10) and Elizabeth Dovey (8 years) were apprenticed to three different farmers, a mile or two apart. How did these children feel, leaving their homes, parents and sisters at such an early age? There would be no chance of Susannah acting as a substitute mother, and comforting the younger children as she might have done had they been together. And how did the parents feel, losing their family under the influence of poverty? Sarah (8) and Nancy James (7), Richard Nash (7) and Eleanor Jones (7) were other children apprenticed at this time. Older people will remember that this system sometimes continued in families into the end of the 19th Century. Young children were taken supposedly as a favour to them and their parents, whose homes were over-full, to live with relatives and work in their shop or on their farm as unpaid servants.

Perhaps the most poignant of the indentures in the parish records is the following:
An Indenture of 18.11.1800, sealed and delivered in the presence of Mary Dangerfield, William Jones, William Symmonds, Ann Bosley and Philip Ballard.

Between John Woodyatt of Netherley and William Jauncey (Chwdns) and William Jauncey and Henry Dangerfield (Overseers of the Poor) and Joseph Lloyd, Chimney Sweep, of Dymock.
“do put and bind Joseph M, a poor boy of this parish, (Mathon) being of the age of 9 years or thereabouts, to be apprenticed to the said Joseph Lloyd to learn the Trade, Art, Business and Mystery of a Chimney Sweeper ... and with him to serve during the term of seven years ... his secrets keep, and his lawful commands everywhere gladly do and perform. He shall not haunt ale houses nor gaming houses, nor absent himself from the service of his master day or night ...

Whereas it is necessary for the boys employed in climbing to have a dress particularly suited to that purpose, the said Joseph Lloyd is covenanted to find such suitable dress, and over and above one whole and complete suit of clothing, with suitable linen, stockings, hat and shoes... and further that the said Joseph Lloyd shall once in every week cause the said apprentice to be thoroughly washed and cleansed from soot and dirt ... nor shall Joseph Lloyd require or force the said apprentice to climb or go up any chimney which shall be actually on fire .... but shall in all things treat him with as much Humanity and Care as the nature of the employment of a Chimney Sweep will admit of ...”

Lord Shaftesbury’s Act of 1875 finally put an end to the infamous practice of using small boys instead of long brushes to sweep chimneys.

In the 1760’s 9 people were being supported by the parish, and a work house was established at the Brays, a farmhouse near Old Country. This was a radical change in the way of helping the poor, from the system of ‘outdoor relief’ i.e. helping them to continue to live their own homes, to ‘indoor relief’ - establishing a central house where they could live and partly support themselves by working. The parish accounts contain frequent references to food and drink, and materials for the occupants to work with.

1763 Mr. Smith for hauling a hundred of faggots for the work house.
Bridget Mathuce (Mathews ?) for looking after the work house for 6 months £6 10s.
For ale at Mary Jones’ berring 3s.
A peck of oatmeal
A hogshead of cider for the workhouse
Beef for the work house
Paid for mending shoes
Paid for a spade
Bread for the use of the work house
For work house - malt hops, cider, beef, cheese, wheat
Making clothes for the boys at the Brays
To be allowed for spinning done at the work house
Paid for half a stone of flax

But perhaps most interesting of all, is a tiny scrap of paper written probably by Mrs. Matthews: “Sir, there is a great complaint at the Brays for wood, beef and salt.”

As always, the parish officials were grappling with the problem of providing adequately for the poor, without making the workhouse more attractive than working in the fields in all weathers. Work house conditions probably varied greatly about the country, but in general the kind of work required was stone-breaking, oakum picking, gardening and household work. Probably the most irksome feature for the inhabitants was the loss of independence involved.

The records contain a document which gives some idea of the difficulties of obtaining a settlement in a parish in which a man wished to establish himself. John Ravenhill is almost certainly an ancestor of Thomas, who in 1840 owned the ‘Cliffe Arms’ and the cottage still known as ‘Ravenhill’, and land at Smith’s Green. Before he could settle in the village he had to satisfy the parish officials of his ability to support himself.

The examination of John Ravenhill, now an inhabitant of the parish of Mathon is the said county (Worcs.), Tailor and Staymaker. Taken upon his oath, the 5th of May 1756.

This examinant saith he has heard and verily believes he was born at Middleton in the County of Hereford, and when about 8 or 9 years old went with his father, Richard Ravenhill, who purchased a freehold estate at Kimbolton, value seven hundred pounds, where his father has ever since and now resides, and lived with him about six years, during which time he worked for him in the art of tailor and staymaker, and then left him, and went to work for William Webb at Colwall in Herefordshire by agreement at two shillings and eight pence a week, and to part giving a month’s notice to each other, and worked for him upwards of two years pursuant to such an agreement, and has not, to the best of his knowledge gained any settlement subsequent thereto.

It is interesting to notice that John, who came from a prosperous family, and who was a qualified tradesman, still had to be examined, and we may wonder how much more difficult it might have been for a labourer to gain a settlement.

The Constable’s Accounts are also to be found in the parish book. His year of office was an arduous one as he arrested criminals, moved on vagrants, inspected ale-houses, certified that no tobacco was being grown for sale (and it was a favourite crop) and supervised those drawn by ballot for the militia. He was responsible for the collection of rates and the enforcement of church attendance. Not infrequently he travelled on parish business, and then the expense item, ‘me and my horse -- 1s. 6d.’ appears in the account. ‘The apprehending of George Hill 15s.’ must have involved a considerable journey, and on another occasion in 1759, is the entry, ‘Expenses of meeting the Crowner at Great Malvern upon the account of the man that hanged himself.’

Towards the end of the century, England was at war with revolutionary France, and a legal obligation was placed on parishes to, find men for the Navy, and this was the occasion for an unusual entry in the Constable’s account. ‘A journey to Severn Stoke to procure a Sailor’. Parishes were authorised to offer monetary bribes to recruits, and probably Severn Stoke was thought to offer a better chance of finding an impecunious sailor, working on the Severn, who might be willing, for the sake of a few pounds, to enlist in the Navy of Nelson’s time. Men from the parish were also liable to be drawn for the militia, but they at east were liable for service only in the British Isles, and sometimes not outside their own county. Substitutes could be sent, often men who were out of work. One spring of nobility (not in this parish) who had been drawn in the ballot, sent as substitute, his 40 year-old butler. In 1826, the Constable of Mathon, Richard Gardiner, had to report that in spite of lengthy searching, he had been unable to find Thomas Caswell, who had been drawn for the militia, and had evidently decided that a soldier’s life was not to his taste.

Unfortunately the 18th Century ended in a black period for working people, and Mathon must have shared in this. Wages had hardly risen at all in the period 1780 to 1800, at least in the counties unaffected by the Industrial Revolution, where there was competition for labour. In Herefordshire 6s. to 7s. per week and two dinners and cider was the average pay at the turn of the century, yet prices had doubled, and in some parts of the country there were riots over the price of bread. During this time, the percentage of the working population employed in Agriculture fell from 45% to 35%. It must have been a difficult time for everyone who hoped to make a living from the land.

1. R. C. Gaut, History of Worcs. , 1939
2. W. E. Tate, The Parish Chest, 1946

Old Country Farm — Hopkilns reached the West Midlands in the early years of this century, and the first ones were round; later they were built square to house simple machinery.

19th Century

The difficult times of the late 18th Century were succeeded by a period of high prices during the Napoleonic wars, when farmers prospered but after the Battle of Waterloo in 1815, there was a farming collapse, prices tumbled, and farms bought at high wartime prices were sold at a loss. There is no sign of these events in the parish books. Life as ever seemed to go on its usual quiet way, and the main concern of one of the first meetings of the century of the parish officials chaired by the Rev. Allen Cliffe was that all the people who owned land adjoining the highways should ‘cleanse and scour their ditches and lay and plaish their hedges, and crop their trees’. A new list of apprenticeships was drawn up, and a surgeon, Mr. Henry Beale appointed at a fee of £6 6s. to care for sick people in the parish who could not afford his fees. Midwifery and surgical operations were however excluded.

The reputed father of Elizabeth P’s male bastard child was to be ‘called upon in the regular way to recover the sum already paid, and insure the parish against any further expense.’ John H was to take care of his grandson, James for two years at the sum of one pound ‘except in case of broken bones or any other misforting to indemnyfy the parish from all other expenses.’ John C agreed with the Churchwardens and Overseers ‘for the house I now live in at Pemberton at the yearly rent of ten shillings for year for myself, Dolly D and Mary B to live in.’ The workhouse at the Brays does not receive any further mention, but the parish did own several houses in addition to Pemberton’s Pitch, including cottages at Smith’s Green. The parish officers were obviously in some difficulty at this stage, and in 1828, presumably as a temporary measure, the Vicar of Mathon, who owned Netherley, and lived there, rented the vicarage to the Churchwardens at £10 per annum for the use of the poor. The following year, they agreed to sell the parish houses by public auction, and build a workhouse with the proceeds opposite Pitt’s Cottage, and to enclose a piece of waste land on the opposite side of the road to use as a potato garden. None of this appears to have happened, as the parish houses were not sold for another seven years and the Vicarage was used for six more years. The provision of satisfactory housing for these poor folk must have been a most difficult problem for the unpaid parish officials, and one that local councils later found far from easy to solve. The Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834, brought the end of outdoor relief for the poor, and set up the system of workhouses with several villages grouped together (hence ‘Union’) to share the cost of facilities. Mathon’s poor were sent to Ledbury Union Workhouse. It is sad that this well-meaning measure inaugurated a system which was dreaded by many working people for a hundred years, a miserable end which lay in wait for hard-working folk after a life of toil. The separation of man and wife, the uniform, the monotonous food, are too well known to be discussed here. It was almost certainly to fund their share of the Union workhouse that the parish sold the houses that they owned, three at Malvern Hill, two at Pemberton’s Pitch, two at Smith’s Green, and one at Moorend Cross. Mrs. Mary Ann Layton bought two houses for £70, and Peter James two more for £60. The two houses at Pemberton’s Pitch were also on sale at £60.

At this time the parish officials were concerned that 28 people had attempted to enclose land on Malvern Common, and the Hayward, Richard Woodyatt, who lived at Parker’s and earned a salary of £5 for his post, was ordered to ‘throw open and remove all encroachments.’ Legal proceedings were started against five of them. Richard was also to be ‘put upon his duty to impound any stray animal and levy a fine before releasing it.’ He was allowed to pocket the money for his trouble. If the animal was not claimed within ten days, ‘it must be cried in the churchyard, and by the Town Crier of Ledbury and Worcester and if not claimed, sold at the market to defray expenses’. He was also instructed to impound any horse, mare, gelding, mule or ass suffering from Riff, Mange, Glanders, Snitch, or any other infectious disease. He had to apprehend anyone cutting or stealing trees, brush, hop-poles, vegetables or fruit. A pound had been built at this time near the present church car park and they obviously wanted to put it to good use. The Hayward’s was clearly an important appointment, at a time when there was much interest in improving farming practice, and perhaps when fences and hedges were not so good as they might have been. The hayward might be thought to have deserved a higher salary but it was probably assumed that he would have another occupation - many men had.

For hundreds of years, people had paid one tenth of their crops and increase of live-stock to maintain the church and the parson. Rectors had been entitled to the great and small tithes, and vicars to the small tithes only. The great tithes were corn, hay, and wood, and the small tithes other crops, but especially wool and the increase of livestock, and it was to store these crops that the magnificent Tithe Barns were built, like the one at Bredon. But now, in 1836, the Tithe Commutation Act provided for tithes to be paid in cash instead of crops, and as a result, the parish, like many others, was surveyed, and a large scale map produced, measuring some 8 feet by 5 feet, showing every field; its use, whether devoted to arable, pasture or coppice; its name, its area, who owned it, who farmed it, and how much it should pay as a tithe. It was in fact, the most complete picture of the area which had ever been produced, and a splendid source of information to anyone who is interested in the parish in 1840, and containing far more information than can be condensed into the present chapter.

Perhaps the most important is land ownership. William Bateson Cliffe with 491 acres was the largest landowner, the Dean and Chapter of Westminster owned 210 acres (Church Farm) but five other people owned more than 200 acres each, four owned between 100 and 200 acres, and 26 people owned from 2 to 100 acres, so there was a good distribution of land. The largest of the mediaeval shared fields, Red Field, of 60 acres, had become no less than 26 fields, owned by 9 people. Of these nine, John South owned 4 acres of land in the parish, William Reece 11, and Thomas Hendrick 22, and the other six owned between 44 and 210 acres, so most of this common field had been acquired by the large farmers.

The land was divided roughly in halves between arable and pasture, (1404 and 1278 acres respectively). There was 108 acres of hops, so evidently local farmers thought they were a profitable crop, unlike W. Pitt1, writing in 1813, who considered they were ‘a very precarious crop, subject to changes so sudden as to baffle all human care or foresight.’ Blight and mildew were hazards, for which at the time there was no known remedy, and if that was not enough, Pitt says, they were an expensive crop to grow. At all events, hop-picking provided work for the women, who were paid 8d. per day and breakfasts (or 9d. without food) and 3 pints of beer or cider per day.

One of the few omissions of the Tithe Report is any information about fruit growing. The fields having ‘orchard’ names are shown, but it cannot be assumed that all of them were growing fruit at that time, nor that there were no fruit trees in the other fields. However, contemporary accounts make it clear that vast quantities were being grown. John Chambers2 wrote in 1816, ‘The country lying on the west side of the Malvern Hills is remarkable for the large plantations of apple and pear trees and the consequent production of cider and perry, particularly the latter, which in general is rich and of fine taste.’

There is so much in Mathon’s history in praise of cider, that it is interesting to find the following conversation recorded:3

“Master, what horses shall I take to drive cider mill?”
“D---n the cider, and the mill too; you waste one half of your time in making cider, and the other half in drinking it. I wish there was not one apple in the whole county. You all think of cider, no matter what comes of plough.”

The Census returns of the mid-19th. Century show an increasingly organized, complex and prosperous society developing, and the occupations given in the returns make interesting reading. They show a society which had not yet become dependant on the mass production of clothes, so the village had its own tailor, and some of the farmers’ wives describe themselves as ‘dressmakers’, ‘seamstresses’, or more humbly ‘plain sewing’. There were also in the village several ‘cordwainers’ (shoemakers) and we can guess that anything their shoes lacked in style, they made up for in strength. Several women were ‘glovers’ which had long been a country occupation in this area as well as in Oxfordshire, Somerset and Devon, and children began to learn the trade at seven or eight. It was said that in 18644, 3s. 6d. was paid for making up a dozen pairs of ‘best men’s gloves’, and a mother and two daughters could make up 6 pairs a day. Such occupation, along with hop-picking, the cold winter job of stone-picking in the fields, harvesting, mushrooming, and blackberry picking often meant for many village mothers and children, the difference between a basic existence and a very little comfort.

The Victorian period, like those before it, was dependent on the horse for transport. By 1900, the horse population had reached a surprising figure of 3.5 million. At the local level, in 1881, at the sale of Church Farm when Mr. Charles Oakley was ‘declining farming’, he kept 11 working horses, and had a trap and a phaeton. A whole range of occupations was centred round the horse, and many of them were represented in the parish. There had been several blacksmiths since early years. William Watkins who lived at Tadpole Cottage in 1871, Joseph Hickox born at Bosbury, who lived and worked at Horsehole, and whose name appears in the records as Ecock, Heacock and Hickok, James Brant at Ham Green, William Saice, and Henry James were among them. There were several men practising the highly-skilled craft of wheelwright: John Price, William Jones and George Price who lived at Pemberton in 1851 were some of them. There were also grooms and waggoners. Several carpenters lived in the parish, including George Pitt who lived at the cottage of that name, and Samuel Archer, who lived at Twynings House, and repaired the church gallery. A thatcher was still finding work in the village, as indeed he might have done into the next century, and there was still a miller. The Vale family, at Mathon Court, the Vicar, and some of the farmers employed servants of various kinds, cooks, housemaids, grooms, washerwomen, parlourmaids, gardeners. Rev. William S. Vale, who lived at Mathon Lodge with his wife and two children, employed a cook, nurse, housemaid, kitchen girl, groom and page. There were bakers, shopkeepers, a victualler, beer retailers and a gamekeeper. One man describes his occupation as ‘profession of drawing’, and one man simply as ‘pauper.’ The most common occupation was still agricultural labourer, despite the national statistics which show a steady decline in the number of people employed on the land. The large farms were great employers of labour for most of the century. Richard Wall, at Church Farm in 1861, employed 30 men, 2 boys and 2 women, and John Jauncey employed a similar number at Hollings Hill. There was now more movement of men from village to village in search of suitable employment and a better cottage, as the family grew. The 1851 census shows that men who were ‘head of Household’ were more likely to have been born in a village a few miles away than in Mathon itself. Thirty-three men were born in other villages and ten in Mathon. This was probably due to the system of hiring farm labour in use at the time. Men went to a central point in the village, sometimes to a ‘Mop Fair’ in a nearby town, and were hired for a year less a day or two, in a process which was much disliked by some people, who compared it to a cattle fair. There is a stone slab near the church, which is said to be a hiring stone, on which deals were struck between master and man, and a small sum of money was handed over to seal the contract. Perhaps the proximity of the church was intended to convey the binding nature of the agreement.

William D., a Mathon man, who worked as a labourer on farms in this parish, in Coddington, Great Malvern, Bromsberrow and Leigh, served two years in the militia, and worked in Hanley Castle and Leigh before returning to Mathon on old age. Not many men travelled as far as Vincent Bosworth who farmed Ham Green at this time. He was born in Northamptonshire, but we cannot tell what prompted him to travel so far in search of his farm.

A similar analysis of the wives’ places of birth shows that most of the men married girls from Mathon or Cradley. The wanderings of the family in search of a better job or accommodation can often be followed by referring to the birthplace of the children. John Hill, who farmed Bank Farm in 1851, was born in Upton, his eldest son in Upton, his daughter and next son in Munsley, and his two youngest sons in Mathon.

The practice of working on two or more jobs, ‘moonlighting’ as it is now known, is not a new phenomenon. The census returns show that it was not unusual in the village in the 19th Century. Peter James, who has already been mentioned when he bought two houses at Smiths’ Green, was a cordwainer by trade, a shopkeeper, was the parish clerk for many years, and when in 1834, the church replaced the bass viol, which with a clarionet and bassoon was used to accompany the hymn singing, it was put into his care. Thomas Ravenhill, who kept the ‘Cliffe Arms’, like his ancestor, John was a tailor and owned 22 acres of land, and Elisha Thomas, describes himself as a grocer, but found time to farm 6 acres. Those who are interested in ‘Women’s Lib’, would perhaps be surprised to see how many women were farmers, though of course some of them were widows, who continued to farm with the help of a bailiff, to supervise the daily work. In general, the need to own a little land, and produce some if not all their own food, seems to have been common amongst all who were able to do so.

The Vicar of Mathon, George Reece, farmed Netherley at this time, and in doing so, was repeating the practice of his Anglo-Saxon predecessors, who worked alongside the village people on the glebe land. Whether the vicar ploughed or supervised, evidently it was a healthy occupation. He was vicar for fifty years, and died aged 78 in 1848.

The directories published in the 19th Century such as Billings’, Kellys’ and Littlebury’s give some useful information about English villages. This is what Billings’ Directory of 1855 said about Mathon.

Rev. A. J. Douglas Vicar Pitt Robert Shoemaker
Rev. P. H. Lee Curate Price George Wheelwright
Archer Samuel Carpenter Price John Wheelwright
Atkin John Tailor Racester Ann Farmer
Bennett Thomas Farmer Racester John Farmer
Southend Mathon Lodge
Calder William Farmer Rutter Edward
Old Country
Downing John Farmer Saice William Shopkeeper and
Mathon House Blacksmith
Ecock Joseph Blacksmith Shapland John Farmer
Moorend Farm
Graves John Farmer Smith Robert Farmer
Upper House
Holyoake Mrs. Farmer South John Farmer
Croft Farm Netherley
James Peter Shopkeeper and Thomas Elisha Shopkeeper
Parish Clerk
Janucey John Farmer Thomas William Beer Retailer
Hollings Hill ‘The Case is Altered’
Jauncey Robert Farmer Trigg William Victualler
Church Farm ‘Cliffe Arms’
Johnson Charles Carpenter Wall William Farmer
Bank Farm
Jones Frederick Shoemaker

There was a small parochial school, supported by contributions and the children’s payments. Number on roll 40 Mary Ann Cohen Mistress.
William Thomas was the grandson of Thomas Ravenhill, and the inn he kept, at the present ‘Elms’ farmhouse was remembered by a Mathon resident, the late Mrs. Pollard. It had a most unusual name, ‘The Case is altered’, sometimes abbreviated to ‘Case Alter’ or just ‘Case’. The name came from a title used by Ben Jonson for a high 16th Century comedy, and refers to a story about an eminent lawyer, Plowden, who was once asked what ground there were against the owner of pigs which had invaded the complainant’s garden. “Very good grounds,” he replied, but when told that the pigs were his own, he said, “Then the case is altered.” Evidently it was a joke which was much appreciated, and passed into the collection of pub names. As there was another inn at what is now Lower Harcourt Road. ‘The Old Bell’ and a cider mill nearby, and also a beer house at Moorend Cross, there was no shortage of places where a thirsty man could find refreshment, when he had the money.

1. W. Pitt, General View of the Agriculture of the County of Worcs., 1813
2. John Chambers, A General History of Malvern, 1817
3. John Clark, General View of the Agriculture of the County of Hereford, 1794
4. Mingay, Rural Life in Victorian England, 1977

Houses & Cottages 1840 from the Tithe Map

Owner        Occupier

1    Cottage    John Night        Richard Weaver
2    Twynings House    John Night        Samuel Archer
3    Tything House        William Jones
4    Mill House    Thomas Bayliss        John Baskerville
5    Cottage    Thomas Bayliss        unoccupied
    Cottage    Thomas Bayliss        William Wilcocks
6    Lane End Cottage        Thomas Hendrick
7    Lane End Farm        William Vale
8    Town House Farm    William Symonds    John Hall
9    Yew Tree Cottage        Peter Pullen
10    Warner’s Farm    Joseph Shapland        James Blisset
11    Cottage        Edward Smith
12    Pitt’s Cottage    John Pitt        James Hill
13    Old Lands        Elizabeth Roberts
14    Parker’s        Thomas Bowers
    Parker’s Cottages    Thomas Bowers        Richard Parsons
15    Elms    William Spurrier    Thomas Ravenhill
16    Brook House        John King
17    Cliffe Arms        Thomas Ravenhill
18    Ravenhill    Thomas Ravenhill    Henry Smith
19    Badger’s        unoccupied
20    Cottage        William Bullock
21    Cottage    Rev. G. Reece        Sarah Love
22    Cottage        William Smith
23    Smithy    W. B. Cliffe        Edward Smith
24    Church Farm     Dean & Chapter of     John Jauncey
        Westminster
25    Overley House    Rev. G. Reece

Since 1840, 12 houses have been built in the area of this map, but the houses numbered 11, 20, 21 and 22 have disappeared, and some of the other houses are one dwelling converted from two, with perhaps 2 people living where 8 did previously.

The Church of St. John the Baptist, Mathon

When the church was built at Mathon towards the end of the 11th Century, it was a time when more castles and monasteries were being built rather than churches. If, as there is good reason to think, the village had been in existence for several hundred years, it is likely that the building was a replacement for an earlier Christian church, perhaps a wooden one. The new building was a simple one of rubble masonry, having an earth floor to the nave and sanctuary, and with no seats for the congregation, who stood or knelt for the daily Mass or the Sunday services. There was no pulpit, and no sermon, as preaching did not become popular until the 15th Century. The Mass was celebrated in Latin, and though many attended, they took the sacrament infrequently except at the major festivals, when attendance was almost universal. The stone altar in the sanctuary and the Norman font have not survived, and may have been destroyed, as many were at the Reformation. There was no glass in the windows of this early church, as it was scarce, expensive, and could only be obtained by wealthier churches and monasteries. This small building was the centre for the greatest events on the life of the village, the great festival of Christmas in the darkness and cold of winter, the Palm Sunday procession, the joy of Easter ushering in the Spring. The church and its grounds were used also for those rejoicings which enlivened a hard-working existence, such as Miracle Plays, churchyard fairs, parish ales and morris dancing. Our ancestors saw no harm in using the church for such pleasurable activities. In the days when few could read or write, the church with its wall pictures and Bible stories, and later in the Middle Ages, its stained glass and music gave an opportunity for the village people to be temporarily transported above their everyday lives.

The dimensions of this early church are shown by the characteristic herring-house masonry which can be seen on the outside South wall, of the nave, to the right of the porch, and which was revealed when the stucco was removed during a Victorian restoration.

Late in the 12th Century, the Chancel was re-built and the nave extended eastward and westward. The priest’s door in the South wall of the chancel is of this period, and so is the window on the west side of it. Close to the door is the original piscina, used for the washing of Communion vessels. The two round-headed East windows and the round window above them are of this time. The roof of the chancel is mediaeval, but would be of a later date, when there had been an improvement in woodworking skills. Also part of the first church is the South door with its plaited rope mouldings, a North door opposite, now blocked, and the window next to it which was later enlarged and lengthened.

The West Tower was built in the late 14th or early 15th Century. Its main purposes was to house the bells, but for many years it was a place of refuge for the village people when a raiding party approached. For this reason some towers were built without stairs, or even erected separately from the church (as at Bosbury) so that they could be more strongly constructed against attack.

The South porch and the nave roof were added during these years and are examples of good Herefordshire woodwork. There are six 17th Century bench seats, and the pulpit is Jacobean carved oak. The parish records show that there was a gallery in the church in 1850 when Samuel Archer, a carpenter who lived at Twynings House, made some repairs to it. Many village churches had such galleries, and one can still be seen in Stokesay Church in Shropshire. The musicians, who provided the accompaniment to hymns were seated in the gallery, a clarinet, bassoon and bass viol were the instruments, but they were now near the end of their tenure as the organ was installed in 1866 and the gallery was removed in the restoration of the church in Victorian times. It was probably at this time that the old pews were used to panel the sides of the nave, and new ones installed.

There is an oak chest bound with iron straps and made to hold the parish records. Its bears the names on the lid of the churchwardens, Jo. How, gent, and H. Dangerfield 1698.

Mathon has a ring of six bells, cast by Abraham Rudhall of Gloucester in 1760, and the Sanctus bell by John Martin in 1675. In 1950 the oak frame had to be replaced by an iron and steel one. The work, carried out by John Taylor & Sons of Loughborough, cost £700, which was raised by public subscription and local fund-raising efforts. One bell was re-cast at this time, and bears the names of the vicar, Rev. P. B. Thorburn, and the churchwardens, M. F. Higgins, H. Fitzer. This was the E flat bell, number 2.

1. Treble, F: 4cwt. 2qrs. “Peace and Good Neighbourhood”
2. E. Flat: 4cwt. 2qrs. 19lbs. “Prosperity to the Town”
3. D. Flat: 4cwt. 3qrs. 18lbs. “God preserve our Church and State”
4. C. 5: 5cwt. 1qr. 1lb. “Fear God, Honour the King”
5. B. Flat: 5cwt. 3qrs. 8lbs. “Glory to God”
6. Tenor, A. Flat: 7cwt. 2qrs. 23lbs. “The living to the Church I call, and to the grave I summon all”
Perhaps some of the ringers were sometimes reluctant to leave their beds, because on the Ringing Chamber hangs the following rhyme:

MATHON December 24 1819
You ringers all that do ring here
Ring carefully with hand and ear,
Let everyone observe his bell,
To ring it right and rule it well.
For ‘tis indeed a shame to him
That takes a bell and cannot ring,
It’s better for him to stand off,
Than that Men should at him laugh.
For he that interrupts a peal
Shall surely pay a quart of ale,
Or ring with glove, spur or hat,
Must pay the like, be sure of that.
These rules let’s all observe and use,
That neither bells nor ropes abuse.
In silent order play your part,
For ringing is the best of Art.

A full architectural discussion of the church building can be found in the Victoria County History - Worcestershire or in the Royal Commission on Historic Monuments - Herefordshire East 1931 in Hereford Library.

Incumbents of Mathon Church

Mathon Court

In 1840, Mathon Court, the large house near Lane End was owned by the Vale family who lived in the village for sixty years or more. The present house, which is probably two hundred years old, was the site of an ancient farm. The Victoria County History says that Richard Mucklow was the owner of a ‘capital messuage (house and land) called Hall Court in the time of King Edward VI. (1547 - 1553)’. Near the house there is an 18th Century barn and a mill house and mill stone, and there is said to be a date towards the end of the 18th Century incised in one of the chimneys. In front of the house, stands a mulberry tree, thought to have been planted over three hundred years ago in an attempt to produce silk. In 1669, in the reign of James 1, encouragement was given to plant mulberry trees, with the intention of establishing a silk industry. A thousand trees were delivered to each county town for sale at 3/4d. each. In the reign of Charles II planting was again encouraged. However, it seems that the mulberry was the wrong variety, and the venture was unsuccessful.
William Vale (1785 - 1842) had served in the Royal Navy, and reputedly was fortunate to be awarded a large sum of prize money as the result of the capture of an enemy vessel. When he left the service, he used the money to buy property in Herefordshire, and as well as Mathon Court the family at one time owned Mathon Lodge and Coddington Court. In 1840, William Vale owned 262 acres, and he and his wife Catherine were living at Mathon Court and employing a groom, housemaid, cook and parlourmaid,
Their eldest son, William Scarlett Vale, (1821 - 1869) lived at Mathon Lodge in 1861 with his wife and two children. His younger brother, Martindale, is listed in the Census as a barrister, not practising. In 1880, Major Martindale Edward Vale was drowned at sea.
William Croxton Vale (1859 - 1910) and his wife had three children. They seem to have been an unlucky family, for none of the children lived to the age of 25. Albert died in 1906, aged 17, Noble, aged 24 was killed at Gallipoli in 1915 while serving with a New Zealand regiment, and Edith Marie was interred in Switzerland, aged 22, which suggests that she may have been sent for treatment for a respiratory ailment.
In 1881, the family had left Mathon Court and Lodge, but Henry E. Vale occupied Coddington House, with his wife Frances, and 19 year old son Octavius. Mathon Court was by now the property of John Smith, a retired postmaster, who lived there with his wife and large family of six daughters and three sons and Mathon Lodge was occupied by Henry Tebbitt.
I am indebted to Dr. C Phipps, the present owner of Mathon Court for most of the information about the house.

House, Farm & Field Names

The oldest field names in the parish are those of the mediaeval fields - Red Field, Butt Field and Broad Field.  The name Stallockmore or Stall Meadow which is mentioned in the Glebe Terrier of 1616, seems to be no longer used.  Fields were named for their shape, (Harp, Sling, Pick) for their good qualities, (fertile, sunny, productive) and sometimes for their bad ones (hungry, starving, cold).  They were named for the plants that grew there (broom, aspen, birch) for birds and animals (magpie, fox, snake, doe), for the building erected there, (Pigeon House, Brick kiln, Lime kiln), for farmers long departed and for other reasons for which no explanation is apparent.  The names sometimes changed over the years in a way that reflects that they were more often spoken than written eg. Brace ( 1840) is now Brays.  Copper Orchard (1840) became Cooper Orchard (1926).

Asping Coppice    Aspen trees
Bagburrow Wood    Bagga’s Wood
‘Badger’s’    There was a man called Badger living in the village in 1619, and he may     have built the house, which is of about that period, but a ‘Badger’ was also the name of a licensed dealer of corn.
    The house was a Grocer’s shop and bakery at one time.
Badham Green    Badham is a family name in Mathon
Barland Orchard    Barland was a favourite variety of pear.
Barley Orchard    An orchard next to, or on land previously used to grow a crop of barley.
Birchley Leasow    Meadow land on which birch trees grew.
Blackway Old Horse Pasture    
    Usually refers to land where buildings stood, or where ground has     been blackened by burning.
Bosberry Field    Another spelling of the neighbouring village of Bosbury.
Broom Hill, Brooming Orchard    
    Land where the broom grew
Butt Field    One of the three mediaeval fields.  Land formerly irregularly shaped, the end pieces of a common field.  Sometimes means a field used for archery practice.
Burford Farm    Edmund Burford was a churchwarden in 1690
(Upper) Canada    Fields were sometimes named after distant places
Cockshot Hill    A ride cleared in the woodland to enable game birds to be shot
Colwell Mill Orchard    Another spelling of the nearby village of Colwall
Copper Orchard    A variety of apple?
Court Piece, Court Furlong    
    Near Mathon Court
Dead Water Meadow    The River Rundle, or Cradley Brook flows sluggishly here.
Dobbin’s Farm    Galfrydo Dobyn is mentioned in the Lay Subsidy Rolls, and Robert  Dobyns was a witness to William Cliffe’s will in 1684.
Doe Fields Coppice    Named for the female deer which must have been common on the hills of Malvern Chase.
Dog pit rough    Perhaps connected with the so-called sport of dog-fighting (18th     Century), but may refer to the plant-dock.
Double Pole Hopyard    A windy field where the hops had to be particularly well supported?
Five Acres    Names like this rarely seem to represent an accurate estimate of the     size of the field, probably because in the course of time, pieces have     been added or taken away.  This one is 3 acres.
Golden Vale    Sunny and productive
Goose Foot Meadow    Goose Foot is a weed in grass land
Gorst Hill    Gorse
Great Ground    9 acres - a large field for the parish in 1840.
Ham Green    Mentioned in the Lay Subsidy Rolls - 13th and 14th Century - an enclosure.
Harcourt Road    Named after the owner of Mathon Park at the end of the 18th Century- Robert Harcourt.
Harp Acre    Shaped like a harp.
Home Spout Meadow    Spout is the local name for a spring.
Horse Nuts    Chestnut trees?
Hungry Croft    An unproductive field.
Littley    A small field - 2 acres.
Magpie Coppice    Self-explanatory.
Mill Meadow, Mill Field    
    There are three sites in Mathon with names suggesting the earlier existence of a mill - at Warner’s Farm, Old Country Farm, and at the present Mill House, near Mathon Court.
Moat Farm    There is the remains of a moat here, usually attributed to the 13th  Century.
Netherley Farm    ‘The lower cultivated clearing in woodland’.
Ney’s Meadow    There was a Napoleonic general of this name.  It is possible that the field was named after him, as he was much admired.
Nobody’s Acre    Small field, the ownership of which was contested.
Old Country Farm    One of the most important farms in the parish.
Old Lands Cottage    Until comparatively recent times a shop and bakery.  This name, and the name ‘Old Country’ suggest the mediaeval fields, which lay between the two houses.
Orles Meadow    Alders grew there.
Overley Cottage    ‘The upper cultivated clearing in woodland’.
Ox Leasow    A meadow used for ox pasture.
    Oxen were used as draught animals before horses became popular.
Parker’s    A yeoman’s house in the village, bearing the date 1610.  Probably the name of the first owner.
(The) Pick    A field coming to a point like the head of a pick.
Pigeon House Meadow
    A field behind the church which must have been the site of the pigeon house belonging to the Lord of the Manor and which provided him with a supply of eggs and meat in winter.  Some mediaeval     pigeon houses still survive in the county.  They were unpopular in those times, as the flock often numbered 200, they fed on the village crops, and only the Lord of the Manor was allowed to keep pigeons.
Pleck    A small plot, often waste land.
Powick Ham    Named after the nearby village.
Quabb Cottage, meadow, lane    
    Boggy land
 
Rails Nap    A fenced plot on a hill-side.
Ravenhill Cottage    Thomas Ravenhill owned this cottage and the ‘Cliffe Arms’ in 1840.
Red Field    The largest mediaeval arable field.
Red-streaked Orchard    A favourite variety of apple.
Rook (sometimes Ruck) Row Farm    
    May be named after a farmer rather than the bird.
Sling    Shaped like the leather part of a sling, narrow and often curving.
South End    The hamlet south of the village.
South Hide    The south hide of the village.  A hide was usually said to be 120 acres.
Spout Farm    No longer in existence.  It was owned for many years by the Dangerfield family, and old maps show that it was near Mathon Lodge.  Locally a spout is a spring.
Smith’s Green    Near South End.  For many years a smithy stood here and may have provided the name.
Stockton Farm    John Stockton lived in Mathon in the mid 17th Century.
Stubby Plot    Land where trees had been failed, and the stumps left in the ground.
Sun’s Hall    A sunny field.
Sweet Meadow    A good productive field.
Three lands in Inchley Field    
    Probably a very old name - ‘lands’ is the name for strips in the open arable field.
Town House Farm    Mentioned in the Lay Subsidy Rolls of 1275 and 1327.
Tynings    Enclosed land.
Tythings Cottage    The taxes levied on produce to support the church.
Vale of Evesham    A favourite variety of wheat.
Whistle Hill    Open to strong winds?

Now try your hand at these.  Probably some are named after previous owners.
Peter’s Park, Big Blunts, Little Berrets, Little Hadmans, Hill Out Coppice, Butler Well Coppice, Moundings, Hockett’s Meadow, Sexton’s Meadow, Crutchett’s Meadow, Edcott’s , Ediott’s, Mondings, Long Mondene, Cheese Cake and Little Have a Care

Mathon 1900

The turn of the century found even the quiet villages of England concerned with the last and greatest of its colonial wars, the Boer War.  Rev. G. W. Potter, the vicar, and Colonel Thurlow, the owner of Mathon Court, attended a meeting at Cradley to set up a recruiting drive for Rifle volunteers from Cradley Mathon and Storridge, and at the end of the meeting, 24 recruits enrolled.  In Malvern, there were frequent ‘patriotic concerts’, which almost always contained Rudyard Kipling’s verses, ‘The Absent-minded Beggar’, intended to raise funds for the families of reservists called to the colours for  service in South Africa.

Mathon was not greatly altered from earlier years, and the discovery of the internal combustion engine had not yet had the effects on farming and village life which were to come later.  The roads were by modern standards, primitive, dusty in summer and muddy in winter, and of such a surface that the early motorists and their passengers wore white overall coats and goggles.  The population was much the same as today. a little over 300, but the village had a school, with a Schoolmaster, Mr. Capewell who played the organ for church services, a resident policeman, and a well-developed and organised community which did much of its shopping in Mathon itself.  There was a baker, a grocer, two inns and a Post Office at the present Brook House.  There was a tailor, Alfred Alford, whose family still live in the village, and James Brant shod the many horses still found in the district and no doubt repaired many farm and garden tools at his smithy at Ham Green.

Steam engines had made some impact on farming practice, and in 1884, Thomas Clarke, followed in 1889 by John Bullock owned a threshing machine at Lane End Farm.  Church Farm, South Hyde, and Moorend Farms were growing hops, and the early Ordnance Survey maps show that hundreds of acres of fruit were grown.  However momentous events and discoveries were afoot, and the folk who were born at this time were to see more change in their lifetime than had happened in the previous hundreds of years.  This quiet village had lived through them all, and we who live in Mathon hope and trust that it may survive for hundreds of years to come.

 
The will of William Cliffe, 1684

 
 

Entry from Kelly’s Directory, 1892